Somebody Needs to Tell The NY Times: Israel Has The Bomb

The New York Times has had plenty to say about Iran and nuclear ambitions recently—in op-eds, editorials and news stories; in reports on negotiating sessions and in articles about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coming speech to Congress, at which he will raise the alarm about Iran’s ability to produce a bomb.

In all these venues—opinion pieces and news accounts—one element of this story is taken for granted: A nuclear proficient Iran would be a threat and cannot be allowed. As Israeli politician Isaac Herzog wrote in a Times op-ed published this weekend, “If [Iran] goes nuclear, the Middle East will go nuclear, putting world peace itself in jeopardy.”

Yet, in spite of all the words devoted to this issue, a major piece of information is missing: The Middle East has already gone nuclear. Israel has had the bomb since 1967 and is counted as the world’s sixth nuclear state, with a stockpile of weaponry possibly equal to that of France and the United Kingdom.

As Netanyahu warns against nuclear research in Iran and the Times editorial board insists that Iran allow “even more aggressive inspections” by the International Atomic Energy Agency, there is no mention of the fact that Israel has refused to allow any inspections of its advanced nuclear program and refuses even to confirm that it exists.

There is no compelling reason to prevent the Times from writing about Israel’s nukes. The newspaper has already published at least one opinion piece urging more openness on the issue; similar commentary has appeared in other publications, such as The New Yorker; and academic groups have openly issued assessments of Israel’s program.

Israeli scholar Avner Cohen has published two books on the subject (the second is titled The Worst-Kept Secret: Israel’s Bargain with the Bomb). Seymour Hersh, a former member of the Times’ own staff, has written one (The Samson Option), and Israeli journalist Ari Shavit dedicated an entire chapter in his book, My Promised Land, to the creation of Israel’s nuclear facility. Shavit speaks with pride of this accomplishment and notes that his chapter won the approval of Israeli censors.

The Federation of American Scientists states that “the existence of Israeli nuclear weapons is a ‘public secret’ by now due to the declassification of large numbers of formerly highly classified US government documents which show that the United States by 1975 was convinced that Israel had nuclear weapons.”

It is only left to determine just how many nuclear weapons Israel possesses and how it is capable of delivering them. The estimates vary from 80 (Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists) to 300 weapons, which can be launched by land, air and sea.

In 2009 Israel and its nukes made the news when the general conference of the IAEA called on Israel to open its facilities to inspection. The Israeli delegate to the conference rejected the request, saying, “Israel will not cooperate in any matter with this resolution.”

In the face of all this, the Times recently published a lead editorial concerning “the protracted nuclear threat from Iran” and how best to contain it. The piece noted that “Iran’s major nuclear installations are already monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency and watched by the United States.”

But, the editorial insisted, this is not enough. Iran must also ratify the IAEA’s “additional protocol” in order to “ensure materials are not diverted to a covert nuclear weapons program.”

A covert nuclear program is precisely what Israel has had since the 1950s, but the Times has nothing to say about it. Moreover, while Israel has refused to sign the nuclear nonproliferation treaty or allow inspections of its program, Iran has done both. It is a signatory to the treaty and allows IAEA visits to its facilities.

Here is Israeli exceptionalism at its irrational worst. The Times has no problem pointing the finger at Iran, which has signed the treaty and allowed inspections, but it shields Israel, which has done neither and is already capable of launching nuclear weapons against its neighbors in the Middle East.

If it chose to report this issue fully, the Times could rely on expert analysis and testimony as evidence, and it could point to the precedence of publications which have “outed” the program in their writings. The information is readily available, but the newspaper prefers to say nothing.

At the least, the Times could say that Israel is “widely believed” to possess nuclear weapons, but it avoids even this construct. As long as Israel refuses to acknowledge its nuclear arsenal in public, The New York Times remains silent as well.

Readers are entitled to a fully informed treatment of the current debate over Iran and nuclear arms in the Middle East, but there is no sign that this will happen anytime soon. The newspaper places its obligations to journalism behind its loyalty to Israel, and readers are the losers in this game—once again.

Barbara Erickson

21 thoughts on “Somebody Needs to Tell The NY Times: Israel Has The Bomb

  1. Excellent piece detailing the hypocrisy and the obvious one-sidedness of the U.S. corporate news media. The NY Times has always been the mouthpiece for the ruling elite, and that of course entails demonizing colonized people like the Palestinians and states which challenge U.S. and Israeli hegemonic power, like Iran.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Capital Kudos to you, Barbara, for yet again, and again, and again exposing the New York Times and its galactic hypocrisy and abject bias in its never-ending attempts to shield and defend indefensible nuclear bomb-laden Apartheid Israel–including the hydrogen bomb! Moreover, the U.S. “government” has gone along with this ludicrous charade, although it was the U.S. who aided Israel in its development of nuclear weapons of mass destruction. Thank you, Barbara, a million times over for revealing the intractable New York Times as a rank fraud when it comes to “reporting” news of the intractable Israel! Cheers
    Jim Michie
    Bethesda, MD

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Well presented, as always! Ahhh — the hypocrisy and dearth of standards of proper journalism of the NYTimes, the rest of the MSM, and too many Americans too ready to do the 3-monkey trick (see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil) as it relates to the Zionist enterprise.


  4. The funny thing is Barbara, the first time I ever heard that Israel had nuclear warheads was a few years ago when Ron Paul was campaigning, and he was rather vocal about Israel’s ability to defend itself, and how Israel didn’t need our protection and financial assistance, and how Israel had hundreds of nuclear war heads. This came as a shock to me because I had never heard it mentioned before, and not long after I remember various Jewish groups refusing to endorse Paul etc. That was my first inkling of a thing called the Jewish lobby.

    Back in those days I didn’t follow the news as I do now, but I did watch CNN and glance at the headlines. In retrospect I was pretty ignorant about the world, but the reason I bring all this up, is I think I was pretty representative of most Americans out there, and in fact I might have even been slightly better informed than many others.

    Which brings me to my point — I bet most Americans today have NO IDEA that Israel is nuclear. It’s rarely pointed out in the MSM, and that’s a significant omission. I don’t know if the blame lies with peoples’ lack of curiosity, or a desire to figure out what’s going on, or if it lies with the media’s intentional manipulations of how they present the facts, but I’d be inclined to put the onus more on CNN, MSNBC, the Times etc. They aren’t supposed to be picking and choosing what they tell us the truth about.

    So thanks for pointing out the proverbial elephant in the room that no one wants to mention.

    BTW, did you see the Shmuley Boteach ad in the Times slamming Susan Rice? Hilarious. Apparently a full page ad in the Times costs over $100,000.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. It is my understanding that Israel possesses no nuclear weapons, but only the “prerequisites” to create them, such as the fissionable materials, triggers, devices, equipment to enrich additional material to weapons grade, delivery vehicles, etc.

    It has been estimated that if Japan wanted to create a bomb, it could do so in less than six months. Perhaps Israel does not have any bombs ready to launch, and that is part of its fig leaf. But I suspect that it could assemble the bombs very quickly. In less than 60 seconds, perhaps.


Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s