“The Awful Clarity” of Israeli Oppression Becomes Murky Spin in the NYT

When writer Michael Chabon visited the West Bank city of Hebron earlier this year, the brutal reality of the Israeli occupation hit him with force. During an interview with the Forward, he appeared “visibly jarred,” and he pulled no punches in describing his reaction.

“Once you see for yourself,” he said, “it is pretty obvious, I think, to any human being with a heart and a mind, it is pretty clear what to feel about it. It is the most grievous injustice I have ever seen in my life.”

His reaction echoes in the words of another author, Ben Ehrenreich, who recently published a book about the occupation, “The Way to the Spring: Life and Death in Palestine.” In his introduction Ehrenreich refers to “the awful clarity of the injustice,” and his book portrays Palestinian resistance under Israel’s state-sponsored system of oppression.

Both these American writers are saying that the suffering of Palestinians under Israeli rule is clear to see, an obvious truth to anyone who witnesses the situation firsthand.

Now, as Peter Baker, the latest New York Times Jerusalem bureau chief, takes up his post, we can ask whether the newspaper will begin to convey this reality to its readers. Will Baker, a fresh new witness with full access to the sites under occupation, give voice to the oppression seen with such clarity by Ehrenreich and Chabon?

Baker’s predecessor, Jodi Rudoren, who left Jerusalem late last year, filed hundreds of stories over nearly four years at the post and managed not to clarify but to obscure the reality of occupation and dispossession. Her stories promoted a narrative of Israeli victimhood and Palestinian violence and deflected Israeli culpability. (See TimesWarp 12-22-15.)

Many voices vied for attention during her stint, but Rudoren turned a deaf ear to some of the most respected sources of information, not only the United Nations and human rights organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch but also Israeli monitoring groups and courageous Israeli journalists. These groups and individuals were constantly documenting and reporting abuses by the Israeli forces, but the news they bore rarely found even brief mention in the Times.

When a series of stabbing and vehicular attacks on Israelis began last fall, several monitoring groups issued alerts, charging that Israeli forces were using the situation to conduct “street executions” of Palestinians who actually posed no threat.

These accusations were bolstered by video and eyewitness evidence and came from groups such as the Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem, Amnesty International and Euro-Med Monitor. To give even more weight to their claims, a group of nine Israeli organizations, including Physicians for Human Rights and the Public Committee Against Torture, issued a joint statement saying Israeli officials were responsible for the climate that fostered these executions.

The Times took little notice. The newspaper’s headlines remained focused on Palestinian attacks, and any quotes about extrajudicial executions were attributed to Palestinian officials, as if these charges were nothing more than the opinions of partisans taking one side in a bitter exchange.

Anticipating Baker’s arrival in Jerusalem, the Times produced a video featuring him in conversation with Rudoren and another former Jerusalem bureau chief, James Bennet. The trio made many references to “the conflict” (with only a single mention of the occupation), and they insisted that Times reporting strives to be balanced and neutral.

If reporters were sincerely looking for balance, however, it would seem that truly neutral parties, such as the United Nations and human rights organizations, would provide an essential antidote to the partisan claims of two adversaries. Yet the Times turns a deaf ear to these sources, no matter how fully documented their findings are, and relies heavily on Israeli officials.

Thus, Times readers are left in ignorance, hearing almost nothing about urgent and repeated appeals from these non-partisan groups. Beyond the latest accusations of extrajudicial killings, for instance, rights organizations have consistently highlighted the mistreatment of Palestinian children held in Israeli custody and the demolition of Palestinian structures, including everything from homes and workshops to cisterns and animal shelters.

Organizations such as UNICEF, Defence for Children International, Save the Children, B’Tselem, Human Rights Watch, the UN Committee for the Rights of the Child and the Committee Against Torture in Israel have tried over several years to publicize the abuse of Palestinian children (See TW 1-13-14.), but the Times has rarely mentioned these reports and then only in stories aimed to spin the information in favor of Israel.

Throughout 2015 some of these groups continued to issue frequent reports and news releases with headlines such as “Rising physical violence against Palestinian child detainees,” “UNICEF report confirms ill-treatment of Palestinian child detainees remains systematic,” and “New U.S. government report highlights violations against Palestinian kids,” but the Times showed no interest in exploring the problem.

Likewise, Israel’s rampage of demolitions in the West Bank is never brought to the attention of Times readers although the United Nations, B’Tselem, Human Rights Watch and other groups have issued frequent statements and demands, urging Israel to end its policy of destruction.

While the Times has remained silent, Gideon Levy and Amira Hass, columnists for the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, have often written about the terrible toll demolitions have exacted from some of the most vulnerable Palestinian communities.

Rudoren wrote occasionally about punitive demolitions, the Israeli policy of destroying the family homes of attackers, but her stories omitted any mention of the much more common demolition of structures because they lack building permits, which are rarely issued.

The policy is a constant threat to Palestinians in a large part of the West Bank, and over the decades of occupation, the state has demolished more than 48,000 Palestinian homes and other structures.

According to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Israel has destroyed 726 Palestinian structures so far this year, displacing 1,020 people. In a recent report, OCHA noted that during one week this month, 42 structures were demolished or confiscated. The report stated, “Twelve of the targeted structures had been previously provided as humanitarian assistance, including emergency shelters, animal sheds, latrines, a community centre, and a water connection; the confiscation of the latter means that nearly 1,000 Palestinians in five herding communities in the Jordan Valley will continue to suffer water scarcity.”

The OCHA report continued, “This brings the number of assistance items destroyed or confiscated since the start of 2016 to 200, almost double the figure for the entire 2015 (108).” In other words, donors such as the European Union and International Committee of the Red Cross have stepped in to provide tents and other items when Israel has destroyed Palestinian homes, schools, playgrounds, water wells and other structures, but the Israeli authorities have demolished even this humanitarian aid.

In this brief report from OCHA “the awful clarity of the injustice” is evident, as it has been evident in hundreds of other reports issued over the years. The rising tide of demolitions, with all its human-interest value, is most certainly newsworthy, but will the Jerusalem bureau of The New York Times report it?

So far the Times seems determined to muddy the waters, avoiding a clear exposition of Israeli brutality, but with a new bureau chief now on board, some readers may hold out a faint hope for change, for an honest and full accounting at last.

Unfortunately, here at TimesWarp, the expectation is for more of the same. It seems unlikely that the Times would allow any straightforward reporting on Israeli oppression to appear in its pages. This would destroy its carefully fostered narrative of Israeli victimhood, “ancient hatreds” and the need to place Israeli security needs above all.

Barbara Erickson

 [Thanks to the TimesWarp readers who wrote to ask why this blog fell silent for most of the summer. It was on vacation during a stint of travel to the former Soviet Republic of Georgia and other places. Regular posts should appear from now on.]

14 thoughts on ““The Awful Clarity” of Israeli Oppression Becomes Murky Spin in the NYT

  1. The genocidal entity currently styling itself “Israel” is a mere transient mole or wart on the enduring body of Palestine. Here today, a bloodstained footnote in the history books tomorrow. Will it shrivel and disappear naturally, or will it be removed surgically? Time will tell, but either way, “You will not be here. We shall fight you until you leave the land you have defiled, and then we shall sprinkle the Haram al-sharif with rose water, just as we did after the Crusades.”

    Liked by 2 people

    • So you see, Barbara, this is the kind of mentality this sort of “journalism” enables. Far too many of these people are not interested in seeing Israel behave in a more docile manner, or simply concerned about the welfare of innocent Palestinians. People like this forget that the area was once a wasteland run by the Ottoman Empire and don’t care about how the area is now a haven for medicine, technology, culture and democracy. None of that matters when you want the Jews off the land…because a piece of territory the size of a postage stamp on a football field of Arab land just isn’t enough.


      • the 20% Arab citizens have greater rights than in their own native countries

        Palestine is their native country, remember? Theirs and their parents’ and grandparents’, generation upon generation. It’s the Jews who are the newcomers, alien intruders having no connection to the land of any kind. Palestine is the ancestral homeland of the Palestinian people, no one else.


  2. I always find it fascinating that there are those who complain about media bias towards Israel while exhibiting a complete lack of any balanced representation of the issues themselves. Let me make it clear from the start that I do not agree with all of Israel’s policies and I do not support everything they do any more than I do my own government. Further, when you are in a longstanding conflict such as this, there will always be bad actors and those who overstep, particularly after a century of hate.

    But let’s also be clear how this started: with the ultra-nationalism turned violent anti-Semitism of one of Hitler’s closest allies, the Grand Mufti. Jewish immigration to the region involved legal purchases and many Arab leaders were committed to preventing Jewish control of any land whatsoever. The Declaration of Eretz Yisrael states IN WRITING that there is a desire for respect of the indigenous population and an appeal to live together in peace, including with its neighbors. The Zionists agreed to the partition and the Arabs did not so instead of pursuing diplomatic solutions the surrounding 6 countries attacked and unfortunately for them, they got their asses handed to them. Things haven’t changed much since, especially having carried on for years under the supervision of Al-Husseini’s nephew, Arafat.

    So while you are all busy ostracizing and boycotting Israel, the only true Democracy in the Middle East, a place where the 20% Arab citizens have greater rights than in their own native countries, where people of all faiths are allowed to worship freely, where women are treated as equals and gays and apostates are not legally murdered as a matter of course…and I could go on…you also ignore the human rights violations of every other country in the region and beyond. Also, I am not seeing a lot of criticism over the Hamas charter which calls for the destruction of Israel and war with all Jews, nor rockets fired into Israel, nor tunnels, nor terrorist attacks. Is that all just “understandable” because they’re freedom fighters?

    I do pity the Palestinians, not so much because the Israelis have turned into a right-wing police state, but because their own corrupt government has sold them down the river, using humanitarian funs for terror, and because their Muslim “brothers” don’t care enough about them to help.

    But by all means, let’s ONLY talk about how horrible Israel is. After all, they should be held to a higher standard, right?


    • Why not tell people about Zionist Jews and Nazis getting together in 1933 to enact the ‘Transfer Agreement’ which had Nazis openly supporting German Jews moving to Palestine and given money, equipment and industries to help them make a life. This lasted till 1942, when Germany had to stop giving money and equipment away since WWII was going bad for the Fatherland.

      Or World Jewry declaring war on Germany in 1933?

      But anytime Israel goes on another homicidal foray into Gaza, targeting hospitals, schools, mosques, markets and even the Zoo, all we hear is..“Squawk, Israel has the right to defend itself, Squawk, Israel has the right to defend itself, Squawk, Israel has the right to defend itself” nonstop in the MSM.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Thank you for completely avoiding the facts I brought up to respond with distortions of your own.

        I often do mention that the Zionist Jews took whatever “encouragement” to leave the Nazis were willing to offer, because the Nazis made it clear their intent was to purge the Jews from Europe (see the original Madagascar Plan) which fell by the wayside when they decided on the Final Solution instead. As far as the Nazis “helping” them, LOL to that. If you can provide evidence of all that assistance as opposed to confiscating all of their belongings and putting them on trains bound for concentration camps, I’d love to see it. Who knew the Nazis were so benevolent? That’s the most creative Holocaust denial I’ve heard yet and that’s saying a lot.

        A “World Jewry” declaration of war that did not, in fact, exist. A lot of people were not interested in supporting Hitler’s anti-semitic diatribe after he published Mein Kampf and there was a boycott in 1933…but in your world, I guess boycotting Israel is great but the Nazis, not so much. Makes complete sense.

        Finally, I offered no support of unwarranted attacks on Gaza, nor mentioned Israel’s right to defend itself. Clearly, any country or entity should have that right and anything beyond that, i don’t support.

        If you could avoid the straw man arguments and historical inaccuracies, it would better facilitate addressing the real issues. My guess is that your narrative about Israel is not one that will be altered by looking at the actual history in an unbiased manner.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, Zionist lies, distraction, diversion, misinformation, manipulation of facts….

      I will write only this. Yasser Arafat, for all the faults he might have displayed after decades of mental and physical torture, humiliation, constant persecution, assassination of (any and all) potential Palestinian leaders et al, brought his people back in the 1960s et seq from an utterly shattered and scattered polity to global recognition of and empathy with their plight at the hands of the Zionist monsters…who have been furthering their agenda with evermore fascist and genocidal urges day by day, decade by decade.

      Go on, mrtapeguy of the random crocodile tear for the ultimate-victim Palestinians: be fascinated, and begone.


  3. It is about time the NEW YORK TIMES started being unbiased in its reporting. That is what the press is supposed to be . All the world asks is that you be FAIR and report everything that happens, not only what your editors prefer !! YOU ARE VERY BIASSED !


  4. Hi.  I think I signed on to this blog several months ago, I do receive every new article, but I forgot what username and password I chose, so I’m unable to ‘like” any comment, or post one of my own. Can you help, please?

     my Samsung Galaxy Tab®|PRO


    • You should find a bubble at the top of the post (like a cartoon speech bubble), with or without a number in it. Click on that, and you will get comments, “like” buttons, and space to make a comment of your own.
      Actually, you just made a comment, which I am responding to, so perhaps your problem was solved before you even asked! It may be that you didn’t see your comment immediately, and that is normal. All comments are moderated.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Thank you so much for your awesome work laying out in full clarity the biases and distortions of the New York Times’ reporting on Israel / Palestine. Hope you enjoyed your vacation!

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s