At the NY Times Silence is the Default Mode for Israeli War Crimes

When Human Rights Watch released a statement this week pointing to cluster bomb use in Syria, The New York Times was quick to pick it up. Under the headline, “Militants Add Cluster Bombing to Tactics, Rights Group Says,” the newspaper informed readers of these latest accusations against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.

Here we have an interesting contrast: HRW released a similar report sounding the alarm about Israeli army actions in Gaza this summer, and the Times remained silent. The Aug. 4 release opened with these words:

“Israeli forces in the southern Gaza town of Khuza’a fired on and killed civilians in apparent violation of the laws of war in several incidents between July 23 and 25, 2014. Deliberate attacks on civilians who are not participating in the fighting are war crimes.”

Although its ISIS story shows deference to HRW, referring to the report often and citing a “rights group” in the headline, the Times ignored the charges of war crimes in Gaza, even in the midst of intense coverage of the conflict.

It was not only the HRW report that failed to make the Times when the suspect in question was Israel. Amnesty International likewise received no mention when the group released a statement on Aug. 7 alleging other atrocities.

The news release states, “An immediate investigation is needed into mounting evidence that the Israel Defense Forces launched apparently deliberate attacks against hospitals and health professionals in Gaza, which have left six medics dead, said Amnesty International as it released disturbing testimonies from doctors, nurses, and ambulance personnel working in the area.”

The Times has never informed readers of this statement, nor has it reported more recent news concerning both AI and HRW: Israel has refused to let staff from either group enter Gaza to investigate possible war crimes.

The Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported this, saying outright that Israel was “using various bureaucratic excuses” to ban the groups from Gaza. The Institute for Middle East Understanding, AI and HRW have all issued statements and reports on Israel’s denial of access, but the Times has ignored them.

In an interview with IMEU, Sarah Leah Whitson, executive director of HRW’s Middle East and North Africa Division, said, “Obviously, Israel doesn’t want us investigating alleged war crimes in Gaza, even though we would look, as we always do, at the conduct of both sides.”

Israel has denied HRW entry to Gaza since 2006 and AI since the summer of 2012. It now tells them they have to register with the foreign affairs or the social welfare ministry. Both ministries set conditions that are “virtually impossible” for international human rights groups to meet, the groups claim.

None of this has appeared in the Times, nor has anything been said about charges that Israel used an experimental weapon, dense inert metal explosive (DIME) this summer in Gaza. DIME releases tungsten microshrapnel, which is carcinogenic and can slice through soft tissue and bone. Victims who manage to survive often lose their limbs and remain with wounds that do not respond to treatment.

DIME has not yet been banned under international law, but evidence of its use is disturbing and most decidedly newsworthy. It should find equal billing with Times reports of cluster bombs in Syria.

It may happen that one day the Times will run a headline saying that ISIS or the Syrian army or Al Qaeda is using DIME, but Israel is another matter, as HRW and other rights groups have found. When it comes to Israeli crimes, silence is the default mode at the Times.

Barbara Erickson

A Moral Morass at the NY Times

As the death toll tops 1,650 in Gaza, The New York Times highlights the loss of one Israeli soldier, and as thousands protest the Israeli assault in Washington, D.C., the newspaper ignores the event and runs a column calling such opposition anti-Semitic.

Today’s Times shows the newspaper sunk into a moral morass in its coverage of the carnage in Gaza. The page 1 story briefly touches on the terrible toll among the residents of Gaza in the fourth paragraph of the article and devotes the rest to the captured soldier and a speech by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

A page 11 graphic of damage in the Gaza Strip indicates lost infrastructure and agricultural land but gives no mention to the loss of lives. And an op-ed by Roger Cohen tells us that protests in Europe are misguided and encourage anti-Semitism.

We get only a piece of the real story out of Gaza in an article at the bottom of page 10, “Hospitals in Gaza Overwhelmed as Attacks Continue.” Unfortunately, this is provided for color, not for news, and the story is missing the hard information readers need—reports from human rights organizations and the United Nations, percentages of civilians killed and other details.

As for the story out of Washington, D.C., the news that thousands from around the country massed outside the White House to protest the massacres in Gaza, the Times provides no coverage at all.

Readers must look elsewhere for news censored in the Times; fortunately, it is not hard to find.

A good start is an  Al Jazeera story titled “Palestinians struggle to ‘dig out bodies’” and subtitled “Dozens of dead bodies remain under the rubble in Rafah, as Israel’s assault on southern Gaza kills scores of civilians.” Here we find the real news of the day, the timelines, data and human stories missing from the Times.

They can also visit The Institute for Middle East Understanding, which documents the destruction of entire families in its report, “Israel’s Mass Killing of Palestinian Families in Gaza.” The article features a photo of the Kelani family (two girls, three boys and two adults), completely wiped out by an Israeli airstrike, and it lists other families destroyed during the present operation.

Readers may also want to see a blog post by Richard Silverstein, which informs us that the Israeli army deliberately killed the captured soldier under the terms of what is known as the Hannibal Directive (See yesterday’s TimesWarp post). It is probable that Times reporters know this but are unwilling (and also forbidden by military censors) to write about it. The story today simply says the “circumstances surrounding his death remained cloudy.”

For information about the demonstration in Washington, D.C. yesterday, readers can turn to The Washington Post, “Thousands from across country protest in support of Palestinians near White House.” Here they will learn that the protest included many American Jews, including members of Jewish Voice for Peace.

The humanitarian crisis in Gaza is nearly beyond imagination, and Israel bears responsibility. The Times today evades these facts and deliberately obscures the terrible carnage a military powerhouse has inflicted on a helpless population.

Editors and reporters cannot plead ignorance here. They have chosen to avoid and obfuscate the real news, betraying their own stated values as journalists and the universal values of a moral society.

Barbara Erickson